
Back Table of Contents Forward
MMUCC
MODEL
MINIMUM UNIFORM
CRASH CRITERIA
GUIDELINE
Improving Crash
Data for Safer Highways
APPENDIX E
Checklist for a State Highway Safety Information System
MMUCC supports implementing MMUCC within a state highway safety information system that is comprehensive, relies on standardized data, stores and distributes timely, complete and accurate data, and provides access to users at all levels. The following checklist lists the characteristics of a model state highway safety information system and provides a model for evaluating your states highway safety information system.
Types of Data
| Does your state computerize statewide the following types of data? | Yes | No | Partial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic Records: | |||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
| Injury Records: | |||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
| Other Data (observational studies, surveys, etc.) |
Scope of Data Resources
| Does your state highway safety information system: | Yes | No | Partial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Include comprehensive information about all components of the event: crash, persons involved, vehicle, roadway? | |||
| Include GPS for location and a GIS based decision support system? | |||
| Include data for all types of roads (local, county, state)? | |||
| Support a data driven management approach for reporting, problem ID, monitoring, evaluation? |
Standardized Data Elements
| Are the data elements in your state highway safety information system based on nationally accepted and published guidelines as well asstandards for reporting thresholds and definitions? | Yes | No | Partial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crash Data: | |||
|
|||
|
|||
| Injury Data: | |||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Functional Capabilities
| Does your state highway safety information system perform these functions? | Yes | No | Partial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Link pre-crash, crash and post crash data to medical and financial outcome (CODES Project). | |||
| Link environmental information (roadway, licensing, vehicle registration, citation) to crash data. | |||
| Collect all records statewide per reporting thresholds and complete routine quality control checks. | |||
| Describe individual crashes or crashes in the aggregate. | |||
| Generate information in a timely manner for meaningful decision-making. | |||
| Facilitate direct access to the data on-line, via the Web and/or on CD-ROM. | |||
| Can distribute data in routine reports, by special request or via query systems. | |||
| Archive historical data in a warehouse or network, so they can be easily accessed to evaluate trends over time. | |||
| Store data in a central repository or on a decentralized network. |
Administrative Characteristics
| Is your state highway safety information system: | Yes | No | Partial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supported by a Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC) that meets regularly? | |||
| Carrying out routine traffic records assessments (within past three years)? | |||
| Involved in ongoing strategic planning efforts involving the TRCC to improve the state highway safety information system? | |||
| Sufficiently funded by the stakeholders to ensure long term survival? |