|
Papers, polls, Q&A items, and comments on this page are oriented to topics and issues associated with Benefits and Safety Risks of in-vehicle technologies. Feel free to post comments on issues outlined below, or in response to papers, polls, and/or questions submitted to our expert panel. Although discussions are meant to emphasize safety impacts associated with in-vehicle technological devices, comments relating to safety risks deriving from non-technological or traditional sources of distraction (e.g., eating, shaving, applying make-up, monitoring kids, etc) are also welcome. A moderator has been assigned to periodically synthesize comments, keep discussions focused and moving, emphasize key points, and offer additional insights into related issues.
DISCUSSION ISSUES/TOPICS
Extent of Problem & Safety Risks
- To what extent is there a safety problem? Are problems limited to new users who are first learning to use the system, or are they more pervasive and wide spread?
- How can we maintain benefits without sacrificing safety?
- What can we expect to see in terms of impacts and how do we assess the appropriate level of safety risks from using in-vehicle technologies?
-
- Can we expect crash rates to increase as a result of in-vehicle technologies?
- How will these technologies affect individual’s ability to drive?
- Can drivers be trusted to regulate their use of these technologies – limiting their use to situations when it is presumed safe to operate.
- Will drivers become less cautious as they become routinely exposed to these technologies?
Research Needs
- What are the important unanswered questions relating to safety & benefits of in-vehicle technology. What research issues should we invest our time and resources studying?
Content Available In Each Topic Area
Paper |
Comment |
Ask the Expert |
Poll |
Extent of Problem & Safety Risks |
|
|
The Impact of Internal Distraction on Driver Visual Behavior 5/17/00 2:30:52 PM
The Influence of the Use of Mobile Phones on Driver Situation Awareness 5/17/00 2:31:00 PM
Issues in the Evaluation of Driver Distraction Associated with In-Vehicle Information and Telecommunications Systems 5/18/00 9:44:51 AM
Individual Differences and In-Vehicle Distraction While Driving: A Test Track Study and Psychometric Evaluation 5/18/00 10:35:38 AM
A Technical Platform for Driver Inattention Research 5/18/00 1:34:17 PM
In terms of safety, what type of distraction concerns you more?
Have you ever witnessed, or experienced a close call or crash resulting from a driver using a cellular phone or from your personal use with a cell phone?
How capable are drivers at making decisions about when it is safe to use technology while driving?
my own inability 7/6/00 8:21:30 AM
driving while inconversated 7/6/00 8:31:21 AM
honk honk honk! hang up the @#$%$#@ cell phone please! 7/6/00 8:40:13 AM
Driving is dangerous enough. 7/8/00 12:16:49 AM
More distractions? 7/8/00 9:24:29 AM
more comments after reading studies 7/8/00 9:28:20 AM
Have you ever witnessed, or experienced a close call or crash resulting from a driver being distracted by something other than a cell phone? (e.g. reading a map, eating, personal grooming)
in-vehicle technology needs to be eliminated 7/13/00 10:17:06 PM
Hang-up and Drive 7/14/00 10:31:02 AM
General comments about distracted drivers 7/14/00 3:33:25 PM
Passenger airbags; forcing children, especially rear-facing infants to the back seat where they are responsible for crash causing driver distractions. 7/14/00 5:48:07 PM
Multitude of distractions 7/15/00 11:26:03 PM
Distraction Perspective 7/17/00 10:42:58 PM
Driving is Given Less Attention Than it Deserves 7/18/00 9:10:49 AM
Now that we know..... 7/18/00 9:15:10 AM
Lonely on the road 7/18/00 5:18:40 PM
cell phones 7/18/00 5:27:39 PM
Distractions 7/18/00 8:09:55 PM
Latest attempt to legislate common sense at the expense of freedom 7/18/00 9:21:39 PM
Children in the back seat 7/18/00 10:27:26 PM
Benefits are minimal; not worth the risks 7/19/00 10:20:19 AM
Comment on "Benefits are minimal..." 7/19/00 5:07:26 PM
Benefits---I am not convinced 7/20/00 10:42:30 AM
There is a solution - it's called the train 7/20/00 12:34:16 PM
The *real* problem 7/21/00 11:52:59 AM Michael Cochrane Government
Refering to: General comments about distracted drivers
Thank goodness common sense and reason still shine through all the rampant emotionalism about the use of technology in vehicles. As much of a distraction as cell phones can be, they are only the tip of the iceberg; and, I believe their use is actually getting an unfair rap in the current buzz about driver distraction. Why has no one mentioned the fact that the quality of our driving is a direct reflection of the quality of both new driver training as well as periodic recertification? Having lived in both Germany and England, I can tell you that the foundation for this problem lies in the abysmal to nonexistent level of driving instruction and licensing in this country. A good driver has learned and internalized three important things: 1) the ability to handle (really handle) an automobile even at the limits of its performance (i.e., an emergency maneuver) 2) a respect for *all* the traffic laws (not just speeding) recognizing that they are there for our safety and for better traffic flow 3) a heightened level of awareness and concentration on the act of driving, including (but not limited to) anticipation of other drivers' potential dangerous actions. That's it. These three things make good drivers. We should be rigorously teaching them in regulated driving schools. People should have to pay a hefty tuition to obtain certified, high quality driving instruction. To obtain a license, one should have to pass a difficult driving and written exam. To keep one's license, recertification and retesting should be mandatory every 3 years. Failure to pass a recertification driving exam after the second time, will result in suspension of license for 6 months. Of course, this kind of thing will never pass any state legislature in this country, but making better drivers must be the foundation for any attempt to make our roads safer. Why treat the just the symptoms when we could be going after the disease? Michael F. Cochrane, Ph.D.
What about other in-vehicle technologies? 7/21/00 5:24:54 PM
The scope of "distractions" needs to be cast much wider 7/21/00 9:35:32 PM
Trained drivers susceptible to distraction? (See detailed question below) 7/25/00 8:56:18 AM
oh dear its you we should watch for 7/26/00 10:13:43 AM
Driver Training 7/26/00 12:45:19 PM
Engage brain before putting mouth into gear 7/27/00 1:17:58 PM
comment on: Benefits---I am not convinced 8/1/00 9:57:07 AM
RE: oh dear its you we should watch for 8/3/00 7:06:56 AM
Map Readfing while driving 8/3/00 7:25:10 AM
RE: Latest attempt to legislate common sense at the expense of freedom 8/3/00 7:59:16 AM
Referring to: cell phones 8/3/00 8:54:22 AM
RE: Greg Knight's comment 8/3/00 10:14:11 AM
Technology Related Distraction & Crashes (see detailed question below) 8/3/00 10:28:09 AM
Comment on: RE: Greg Knight's comment 8/3/00 12:35:46 PM
Have you been to Westport, CT? 8/5/00 9:25:19 PM
RE: Lonely on the road 8/7/00 11:30:54 AM
driver awareness 8/8/00 10:04:57 AM
Think about it 8/8/00 2:58:44 PM
911? 8/8/00 3:12:11 PM
Critical Input: Headway to vehicle in front 8/8/00 4:46:30 PM
Riding my bike home from work 8/8/00 10:26:39 PM
Infants in the back seat 8/10/00 11:10:47 AM
RE: 911? 8/10/00 12:08:03 PM
Human element cannot be minimized by technology 8/10/00 9:57:59 PM
One size does not fit all 8/11/00 2:27:09 PM
|
Research Needs |
|
|
|
|